In case you missed it, Radiohead have gone all data-aesthetic with their latest video, House of Cards. What’s more, it’s fully zeitgeist-compliant, with open access and a call for re-visualisations of a quite massive dataset: hundreds of megabytes of spatial data gathered with various 3d laser-scanning rigs. If the download stats and early signs are anything to go on, we will be seeing much more of this dataset.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nTFjVm9sTQ[/youtube]

As well as being technically cool, the project is yet another sign of the increasing cultural prominence of data as both material and idea – in that sense, after Design and the Elastic Mind and Wired’s “Petabyte Age“, this is more of the same. But it’s also something different, it seems to me. Like any other visualisation, House of Cards doesn’t only use data, it presents a certain sense of what data is, means, and (crucially) feels like; and this is where it’s different. The dominant narrative of data visualisation at the moment is informed by the networked optimism of web 2.0, where the social sphere, and increasingly the world as a whole, is unproblematically digitised; where more is more and truth, beauty, and commercial success all are immanent in the teeming datacloud.

House of Cards, by contrast, is a manifestation of data melancholy. Data here is low res, with a sketchy looseness of detail that evokes the gaps, the un-sampled points. This data is also abject or corrupt, the scanner intentionally jammed with reflective material, a bit like the metallic chaff used to confuse missile guidance systems. These glitches are familiar devices in electronic music and video, including Kid A-era Radiohead. However here the errors are very much in the data; they have migrated out of the music, which is human, organic and more or less intact here. This disjunction between failed data and the emotional, human domain is what characterises the data melancholy; it’s illustrated beautifully at the end of House of Cards, with the “party scene” (one of Thom Yorke’s ideas for the clip), a social scene decimated into abstract clouds of points. This theme also resonates across In Rainbows, especially in the closing track, Videotape: “this is one for the good days / and I have it all here, in red blue green.” Here image data is again a sort of failed trace of an emotional reality, all that remains of “the most perfect day I’ve ever seen.”

Yorke’s other motif for House of Cards was “vaporisation,” which is clear enough in the clip; I think its most effective in the final shots of the house; the earlier clips of Yorke disintegrating seem a bit langurous, with that undulating look of Perlin noise (is it, anyone?). The house shot in particular reminded me of Brandon Morse’s Preparing for the Inevitable; Morse’s work in general has a related feel about it, though the models seem t be synthesised rather than sampled. Again the poetics is one of cool, digital melancholy, where tragedy is stripped down to a set of vectors and forces (above: Collapse, from Flickr). Here though, rather than a failure of data (sampled representation) it’s a failure of the procedural model, or perhaps failure with, or in, the model. [posted by Mitchell Whitelaw on The Teeming Void]